Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean 2026: Which VPS Wins on Price, Performance & Bandwidth?

Two cloud providers dominate developer conversations when it comes to affordable virtual private servers: Hetzner Cloud and DigitalOcean. Both offer Linux-based virtual servers, SSD storage, and reliable uptime — but they diverge sharply on pricing philosophy, included bandwidth, datacenter reach, and which workload categories they're genuinely optimized for.

For resource-intensive applications — blockchain nodes, high-throughput automation bots, compute-heavy APIs, and data pipelines — the Hetzner vs DigitalOcean gap is not subtle: it can mean a 5–8× price difference for equivalent specifications. For simpler developer workflows, managed databases, and projects where ecosystem integration matters more than raw cost, DigitalOcean's toolkit becomes compelling. This guide breaks down both platforms across every dimension that matters in 2026.

Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean: What Each Platform Is Actually Designed For

Before comparing individual specs, it helps to understand the philosophical difference between the two providers.

Hetzner Cloud is a German infrastructure provider that has historically prioritized raw compute and storage value over developer experience. Its data centers are concentrated in Europe (Germany and Finland) with newer expansion into Ashburn, VA and Singapore. Hetzner's model is built around selling more hardware resources at lower margins. There are no one-click app marketplaces or managed database tiers integrated into the base product — you get a server and you configure it.

DigitalOcean is an American cloud platform that has consistently positioned itself as the developer-friendly alternative to AWS, GCP, and Azure. It provides one-click app deployments, managed PostgreSQL and MySQL databases, Kubernetes clusters, object storage (Spaces), and a clean control panel designed for teams who want infrastructure without deep DevOps expertise. Its pricing is higher per raw spec but bundles more managed services.

2026 Pricing Comparison: Hetzner CX Plans vs DigitalOcean Droplets

Pricing is where Hetzner's advantage is most stark. DigitalOcean's Basic Droplets start at $4.00/month for 512 MiB RAM and 1 vCPU — a lightweight entry point, but the gap widens dramatically as specifications scale upward.

DigitalOcean Droplet Pricing (Basic Tier, 2026)

Hetzner Cloud Shared vCPU Pricing (Pre-April 2026)

The Bandwidth Advantage: Why Hetzner's 20 TB Inclusion Changes the Math

Perhaps the most underappreciated difference between the two platforms is included transfer allowance. Hetzner includes 20 TB of outbound traffic on virtually all shared vCPU plans — a figure that dwarfs DigitalOcean's 1–6 TB baseline depending on Droplet tier.

For most web projects, 1–4 TB is sufficient. But for use cases involving large file transfers, media delivery, blockchain node synchronization, or high-request-volume APIs, Hetzner's bandwidth headroom is a meaningful cost advantage. DigitalOcean charges $0.01/GiB for outbound transfer above the included amount. At Hetzner rates, that overage simply wouldn't occur for most workloads under 20 TB.

Bandwidth-Intensive Workloads Where Hetzner Excels

• Blockchain node operators — syncing with peers on Ethereum, Solana, or similar chains generates terabytes of transfer monthly. See our guide on Hedera vs Solana for dApps for context on node infrastructure requirements.
• Video or media-heavy applications — serving large static assets or video files benefits from generous outbound transfer.
• High-frequency API services — applications making millions of outbound requests compound bandwidth costs quickly. Understanding the difference between HTTP and REST API servers can help optimize how your architecture consumes bandwidth.
• Bot frameworks and scrapers — automation platforms making large volumes of external HTTP requests benefit from the transfer buffer.

Raw Compute Performance: Hetzner vs DigitalOcean CPU Benchmarks

Third-party VPS benchmarks and developer migration reports consistently show Hetzner delivering stronger single-thread and multi-thread CPU performance for the given price tier. A widely cited Talk Python migration report noted approximately 1.2× faster CPU performance and 8× more bandwidth after migrating comparable server workloads from DigitalOcean to Hetzner.

The key driver is processor generation. Hetzner has been aggressively upgrading its shared vCPU fleet to AMD EPYC and Intel Ice Lake processors, delivering consistently high IPC (instructions per cycle) compared to older Xeon processors that power some lower-tier DigitalOcean Droplets. Dedicated vCPU plans on both platforms narrow this gap, but Hetzner's dedicated options start at a lower price floor.

When DigitalOcean's CPU Offering Is Preferable

DigitalOcean's CPU-Optimized Droplets include NVMe storage and are explicitly tuned for latency-sensitive applications. For workloads where predictable, consistent performance within a managed cloud ecosystem matters more than maximum raw throughput — such as regulated fintech apps, production databases, or latency-sensitive APIs — DigitalOcean's product more tightly packages performance guarantees with managed tooling.

Best VPS for Next.js Deployments in 2026: Hetzner or DigitalOcean?

Next.js is one of the most common web frameworks deployed on VPS servers — its SSR (server-side rendering), static generation, and API route capabilities make it flexible for everything from content sites to full-stack applications. Both platforms can run Next.js well, but the tradeoffs differ significantly.

DigitalOcean for Next.js

• One-click Node.js App Platform deployments (managed, similar to Vercel/Render)
• Managed PostgreSQL databases starting at ~$15/month simplify full-stack setups
• Spaces (object storage) for static asset hosting with CDN integration
• Kubernetes for horizontal scaling without managing orchestration from scratch
• Free egress to Spaces CDN helps static Next.js assets

Hetzner for Next.js

• Significantly more vCPU and RAM for the money — a Next.js app with heavy SSR benefits from this headroom
• 20 TB included transfer handles high-traffic deployments without bandwidth billing surprises
• Requires manual PM2 or Docker setup for process management — no one-click deploy
• Object storage via Hetzner Object Storage at ~€6.49/TiB/month (post-April 2026), roughly one-third the cost of DigitalOcean Spaces
• Less native CDN integration than DigitalOcean Spaces

Running Blockchain Nodes on Hetzner vs DigitalOcean: Cost and Performance Analysis

Blockchain infrastructure is one of the clearest use cases where Hetzner's model outperforms DigitalOcean's. Consensus nodes — whether for proof-of-stake, proof-of-authority, or similar mechanisms — require significant storage, RAM, consistent CPU, and high outbound bandwidth. Hetzner's dedicated vCPU plans (CCX series) address all four:

• No shared resource contention — dedicated vCPUs prevent noisy-neighbour effects during peak blockchain sync
• 20 TB included transfer — Ethereum archive nodes, for example, can consume 2–5+ TB monthly in peer-to-peer traffic alone
• NVMe SSD options — fast storage is critical for node state access latency
• Low per-TB pricing — Hetzner volumes at ~€5.18/100 GB vs DigitalOcean Volumes at $10.00/100 GB

DigitalOcean can run blockchain nodes, but operators frequently report overage bandwidth charges or budget Droplets being memory-constrained on mainnet clients. For stablecoin protocols or DeFi infrastructure requiring maximum uptime without cost predictability risk, Hetzner's dedicated options are more defensible.

Hidden and Additional Costs: Storage, Networking & Reserved IPs

Monthly compute prices only tell part of the story. Storage, object storage, and networking add-ons can substantially change the total cost of ownership.

Block Storage and Object Storage

Datacenter Locations and Latency

DigitalOcean operates in 12+ regions including New York, San Francisco, Amsterdam, London, Frankfurt, Singapore, Toronto, Bangalore, and Sydney — providing wide global coverage for applications with geographically distributed users.

Hetzner operates in Nuremberg (Germany), Falkenstein (Germany), Helsinki (Finland), Ashburn, VA (USA), and Singapore. The EU density is Hetzner's strongest suit — for European-facing applications, its German and Finnish data centers deliver excellent latency within the continent, often below 10ms for Central European users.

Hetzner's April 2026 Price Increase: How Much Does It Change the Math?

Hetzner announced that effective April 1, 2026, cloud product pricing will increase by approximately 25–40% across its lineup. The company cited rising hardware acquisition costs as the primary driver. For current customers, this represents a meaningful adjustment — but context matters.

Even after a 40% increase, Hetzner's CX32 (4 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, 40 GB SSD, 20 TB traffic) would move from approximately €5.49/month to ~€7.69/month. DigitalOcean's nearest equivalent Droplet remains approximately $48.00/month. The structural price gap remains large — Hetzner would need to increase prices by 400–600% to reach parity with DigitalOcean's comparable offerings.

Hetzner vs DigitalOcean: Side-by-Side Summary

Which Cloud Provider Should You Choose in 2026? A Decision Framework

Choose Hetzner Cloud if:

• You are building compute-heavy applications — blockchain nodes, ML pipelines, high-throughput bots, large-scale data processing
• Your application generates high outbound bandwidth (>2 TB/month) and you want predictable costs
• Your primary users are in Europe and sub-30ms EU latency is important
• You or your team are comfortable with manual server configuration (Nginx, PM2, Docker, systemd)
• You want maximum vCPU and RAM for a fixed monthly budget
• You are running a cost-sensitive bootstrapped or indie project where hosting economics matter

Choose DigitalOcean if:

• You want managed databases, object storage, and CDN on a single platform without configuration overhead
• Your team uses DigitalOcean's App Platform for automated builds and deployments
• You need global multi-region presence with low administrative friction
• You are deploying short-lived ephemeral workloads that benefit from per-second billing
• Your application stack includes Node.js, Python, or Next.js / NestJS and you want one-click scaffolding
• You want GPU Droplets for small-scale AI/ML inference without managing bare-metal GPU servers

Consider Both Simultaneously if:

Multi-cloud architectures are increasingly viable. Running your stateful, compute-heavy workloads on Hetzner (blockchain nodes, background workers, data pipelines) while hosting your customer-facing application and managed database on DigitalOcean (for easier scaling, managed PostgreSQL, and App Platform CI/CD) is a pattern used by several production teams to optimize cost without sacrificing developer experience.

Official Pricing References

• Hetzner Cloud — Official Pricing (current plans; note April 2026 adjustments)
• DigitalOcean Droplet Pricing (per-second billing effective January 2026)
• GetDeploying: Spec Comparison Tool
• VPSBenchmarks: Hetzner vs DigitalOcean Performance Results

Related Explainers on ObjectWire

• NestJS vs Next.js vs Express — Which Framework to Deploy on Your VPS?
• The Difference Between HTTP and REST API Servers
• Hedera vs Solana for Decentralized Applications
• Proof of Engagement vs Proof of Authority Blockchain Consensus
• The Most Important Stablecoins in the World (2026)

Frequently Asked Questions: Hetzner Cloud vs DigitalOcean

Is Hetzner Cloud cheaper than DigitalOcean in 2026?

Yes, significantly. A comparable 4 vCPU / 8 GB RAM Hetzner plan costs roughly €6–€8/month (pre-April 2026 pricing) versus DigitalOcean's ~$48/month. Even after Hetzner's announced 25–40% price increase effective April 1, 2026, Hetzner retains a large cost advantage across all comparable configurations.

Which VPS is better for deploying a Next.js application?

Both work well, but for different setups. DigitalOcean offers one-click apps, managed databases, and Kubernetes integration that simplify Next.js deployments for teams who prefer a managed experience. Hetzner is the better choice if you want maximum performance per dollar — particularly for traffic-heavy apps benefiting from its 20 TB transfer allowance.

Does Hetzner include more bandwidth than DigitalOcean?

By a wide margin. Hetzner includes 20 TB of traffic on most shared vCPU plans. DigitalOcean typically includes 1–6 TB on comparable Droplets. For bandwidth-intensive workloads — video delivery, blockchain nodes, scraping infrastructure — Hetzner's included transfer can save hundreds of dollars monthly in overage charges.

Is Hetzner suitable for running blockchain nodes in 2026?

Yes. Blockchain nodes require substantial CPU, high bandwidth, and consistent storage I/O. Hetzner's dedicated vCPU options (CCX series) eliminate shared-resource contention, and the 20 TB included transfer handles synchronization overhead for chains like Ethereum or Solana without per-GB overage charges.

What is Hetzner's April 2026 price increase?

Hetzner announced price increases of 25–40% across its cloud product lineup, effective April 1, 2026, citing hardware cost rises. Despite these adjustments, Hetzner's pricing is expected to remain substantially below DigitalOcean's for equivalent compute configurations.

Does DigitalOcean offer per-second billing?

Yes. Effective January 1, 2026, DigitalOcean uses per-second billing with a 60-second minimum (or $0.01 minimum, whichever is higher), capped at the monthly rate. This benefits short-lived Droplets used for CI/CD runners, dev/test environments, or ephemeral compute tasks.

Which cloud provider has more global datacenter locations?

DigitalOcean operates in 12+ global regions including North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, and India. Hetzner focuses on Germany, Finland, Ashburn (US), and Singapore. For EU-centric applications, Hetzner's German and Finnish data centers offer excellent latency. For global distribution, DigitalOcean has more points of presence.

Can I use DigitalOcean for AI and machine learning workloads?

DigitalOcean offers GPU Droplets for AI/ML starting at approximately $0.76/GPU/hour on-demand — useful for small-scale inference or training experiments. Hetzner offers cost-effective dedicated GPU servers for similar tasks but with less turn-key integration. For fully managed ML inference at scale, neither matches AWS SageMaker or GCP Vertex AI, but both are cost-competitive for smaller workloads.

Disclaimer: Pricing figures in this article are based on official Hetzner and DigitalOcean pricing pages and third-party benchmarks as of February 2026, prior to Hetzner's announced April 1, 2026 adjustments. Prices are subject to change. Always verify current pricing on the provider's official website before making infrastructure decisions.